Tuesday, December 29, 2015

Reader Submission: Random Shitty Incidents Around Toronto

Here's a submission from someone describing his various experiences in Toronto:

1. Divorce is ultra popular so much so that it’s now a fad and if you are not divorced, you are a freak. I have ended a countless number of girls with no father and each single one of their mothers blamed the failed marriage on the man. Not a single one took a shred of responsibility – it was all the man’s fault and that’s all they ever talked about. One was prominent enough to talk about how men have emotions too and she used those stories to make men look weak and pathetic as if that justified her misery of being alone and unwanted. She projected these idiotic ideas onto her daughter and thankfully the daughter was of rational mind, but I had to put up with the mother

2. There are incidents when being in places and being male is just shitty luck. Toronto women will openly attack men verbally because they think it’s socially acceptable and funny. They will rudely interject your private conversations because they are judging how you communicate with your girlfriend or female friend. They are listening like Orwell’s 1984. In one case my girlfriend made a joke about that I don’t clean and a random stranger in the elevator just began judging me and rudely said “yeah well why would he?” suggesting that because I am man I am for some reason a prick that doesn’t clean. WTF? My girlfriend felt so bad for saying that, that she felt she needed to say something to make me look good again so she said I make the best cocktails. What should have happened is I should have told the strange woman to mind her own fucking business and that it’s incredibly rude to judge someone like that especially given she doesn’t know any context and I am a total stranger. A lesson for the future.

3. Another incident is when my sister and I were at a pharmacy standing in line. A man was talking loudly on his phone and this miserable hag just injects herself into our conversation and starts talking shit about a total stranger. She said “god that man is obnoxious and he’s so aggressive just yelling like that”. My sister and I laughed it off because we are POLITE unlike her and then a female pharmacist chimed in with attitude talking down about the guy saying he is a dick that does it all the time. WOW, WHAT THE FUCK? Being a guy and talking loudly on the phone credits with excess female ridicule and critique. Fan-fucking-tastic. What we should have said was “be an adult and go politely ask him to speak quieter.” Lesson for the future.

4. Another incident happened when I entered Starbucks and a total strange woman gave me a vile bitch face. I gave an aggressive look back and she looked away. Then I felt her glare so I looked back at her and she covered her face and to her friends, LOUDLY, said “what the hell, does he need help of something”. Oh great, now I’m a person with special needs because I stared back at a total bitch. Toronto women take 0 responsibility for their actions. Absolutely none – everything is the man’s fault.

5. Nightclubs – man don’t get me started here. I stared working at nightclubs at 14 years old hanging coats. I worked in nightclubs until I was 20 years old so I have seen it all inside of nightclubs. I have both perspectives : as a passive bystander when I worked and as an active participator when I went to party. NIGHTCLUBS ARE A CONVERGENCE OF SELF RIGHTEOUS BITCHES THAT BUILD THEIR EGOS BY TURNING GUYS DOWN. I came up to a girl acting like a human being and she gave me this massive bitch face like there was a rotting corpse somewhere, took her friend by her hand and walked away. Wow…. Fuck me for talking to a fellow human right?! Fucking treated me like shit and I didn’t deserve it. What a fucking cunt. Then about a few hours later she did that to about oooo… the whole nightclub and finally a guy, about my age took her by the hand, gave her the two biggest middle fingers and shoved them right in her face. I shook the guy’s fucking hand. Thank god! Finally a Toronto man that could stand up for himself. The cunt gave him the same massive bitch face, pulled her friend by the hand and walked away. That’s what these cunts do, they act shitty to men because they fucking feel superior from it. At this same club there was these two sluts wearing nothing but skin sitting on the couch and I shit you not, there was a line up of desperate fucking men, beaten down by society, thinking they are worthless… just fucking waiting to talk to these two cunts and they were turning down men systematically. I felt so sorry for these men… like dam it…. I can’t believe men are thinking so low of themselves these days, and women are thinking so highly of themselves. It’s fucking depressing.

6. I had guy friends that were with total bitches. These guys were about an average looking 7 and these cunts they were with… maybe a 4 max a 5. And these bitches acted so superior and told these guys what to do and what to think! They fucking ignored their friends like me like I am invisible, like I’m not a human being. And these guys stuck with them!? Why? So fucking sad. I wish they could learn self worth and self respect… but they were born in Toronto with mothers that taught them this way and they have no choice. They know nothing else. It depresses me.

7. Lesbianism is this new attention whoring fad and a convenient way to let men down. At least a way to let down men that don’t fit Toronto women’s idea of perfection… Which is easily manipulable, rich, and handsome…… oh and takes all her shit and never complains… you know…like a dog. So many girls claim to be lesbians and take narcissistic selfies for Instagram kissing their bitch friends and yet not a single one has interest or has ever (or will ever) lick a vagina. So let’s not pretend, idiotic women of Toronto, that you are even 1% lesbian. I know a tonnnnnne of idiots with this complex.

8. In general, on the street, or in the store women are allergic to eye contact. Good god, good luck trying to get one to look at you. And then you develop the same traits and there are entitled women that will get mad at you for not looking at them! Lol. So now you’re stuck, you can’t look at women because soon that will be illegal and if you don’t look at them they get mad. How fucking lovely. Toronto is a sad state and I don’t wish it upon anyone that respects themselves and wants good things for themselves. I hate being here and I can’t wait to get out.


Here’s my background for retrospect:

- Born in Eastern Europe

- Moved to Canada when I was 7, I am 26 now

- Have lived in Florida for 4 months and drove thru the states 3 times

- Have lived for months at a time in Europe and been to places like Warsaw, Bulgaria, Amsterdam, Romania, and the women there are real women with no pretension and with healthy sexualities

- You can call me well-traveled compared to an average person and definitely well-seasoned. I’ve been around, I’ve seen some shit. Toronto is the worst shithole to be in. I think it’s a modern, capitalist city thing. I think it’s a function of this westernization fad seen all over the world and of course the first cities/countries to grab onto this shit are the big capitalized ones like London, Peru, Moscow (pussy riot), New York, and of course the worst and most sexist one of them all – Toronto.

Thursday, December 3, 2015

Marriage, Inc.

A while ago I wrote about Relationship, Inc. I figure now is a good time to write about the more evil complement of this known as Marriage, Inc.

There is a real trend out there in the land of the married. It's a sinister trend as many have already noted, so the purpose of this post is not to repeat what is mostly already known, but instead to shed light on the institution of marriage in a way that I haven't been able to articulate until now. I will draw close parallels between marriage and a cutthroat business, as you shall see.

If you've ever been around women, either through casual acquaintance or via relationships, you'll notice that they tend to want to get married, if not right away, then eventually. From my perspective this comes across as unnecessary because marriage does not guarantee that people will stay together. So it's not an insurance policy in terms of holding on to love or enhancing love. What it is much more likely to be is an insurance policy for financial and economic security, by way of guaranteed (spousal) support, just like people will seek out government jobs, not because they like those jobs, but because of the perks, like having a good pension. So the goal of the marriage-minded female is primarily, and generally speaking, life security, made possible by the legal stipulations and entitlements that are enforced by the state.

The deception is that women will insinuate that getting married is the ultimate expression of commitment and love, and will not admit that their desire is based upon security reasons, as mentioned. This deception can take a further twist when it is implied that unless you are willing to risk your assets and put part of your assets on the line for her then you are not truly in love. So in other words you must be willing to lose something (if you break up), especially if those things that you lose go to her. If you can walk away with your money and assets intact that is a no-deal since it means you're not really in love. And it doesn't matter that during the relationship you might have done a lot of things for her. True love is (according to her definition) signing up to support her even if you are gone. And anything less than that, such as being able to walk away without having to give her anything, is unacceptable.

The irony here is that any argument that suggests that women should be entitled to a man's money and assets must hinge on traditional gender roles where a man works and a woman stays home (and isn't supposed to work) and must therefore naturally depend on the man for support. But relying on this argument negates the modern day reality that most women can and do work, and are encouraged to do so. If women are to be truly emancipated then they can't invoke such double standards when it suits them.

Women who are hell-bent on achieving security in life are the ones you need to watch out for the most. They will say and do whatever they need to in order to ball and chain a man into servitude of their primal needs. Sexually speaking these women are total mercenaries, which can be at odds with their natural libido. For these women it is in their economic best interest to not enjoy sex very much, for this allows them to more easily invoke supply-side restrictions on sex for economic/resource gain. These women are always marriage minded because it creates the legal framework that helps them achieve their goal of 100% security in life. Don't be the poor sucker that falls for their charms. If you must pay for sex do it on a per-use basis via prostitutes which eliminates all the potential trappings.

I've always had a rule, and that is to always start off on a casual level with women, and if it progresses to being more, so be it. But this way I weed out most of the security-seekers who seek to ball and chain a man via the proxy of relationships and marriage. So far this strategy has worked well. However, if you're the type of guy who sings like a canary when a woman asks "what do you do?" then you are swimming in shark-infested waters, and you better watch out! Even the women who seem the nicest can likely be not so nice after all once the ring goes on their finger.

These nice women will start off nice but as they climb the ladder of certainty, starting from dating at the beginning, to engagement, to finally marriage, they will increasingly become less nice, and more domineering. Once the deal (marriage) is finalized they will revert to their true nasty colors.

In achieving marriage, women push you away from independence (from them) and toward enslavement (for them). And the fact that marriage is still so encouraged must hinge on the belief that not doing this means you just don't love her or care about commitment.

Women (not all) will treat marriage as a cutthroat business, with performance requirements, incentives (sex), and eliminating competitors (friends, family of husband, etc.) so that all the time and resources and affections of her husband belong to her. They run marriage like a cutthroat business basically. These women are ALL business when it comes to their marriage. And it is even worse than working for a cutthroat company, since even these companies give you weekends and evenings off (in addition to paying you), and they still expect you to have a life outside of work. However, in Marriage, Inc. you are working 7 days a week, for her.

To ensure that their husband's resources are all funneled into Marriage, Inc, the marriage CEOs (the women) will minimize or eliminate their husband's alliances (friends, family, etc.) and will at the same time increase and nurture their own network of family and friends and sources of support. In business terms you can think of this as eliminating the competition while expanding your business network.

The marriage CEO will also penny pinch as much as she can and will ruthlessly seek savings where ever she can. And she will do this while also spending a fair bit on luxury items that she personally enjoys. She is not too different from CEOs we hear about in the media which ship jobs overseas and cut employee benefits while enjoying inflated salaries. In their twisted minds, what's good for me is good for the company. And in women's minds, what's good for me is good for the marriage. It's the same twisted rationalization.

Even worse, in Marriage, Inc. you have to leave some of your earning potential behind if you leave. Part of your future earnings, upon leaving (separation or divorce), will be garnished by Marriage, Inc. Compare this to a regular company that you work for, in which once you leave you get to take all of your earning potential with you. Now, I'm not opposed to child support, and that's not what I'm talking about here. I'm talking about financial support for the Marriage CEOs (the women) who are fully capable of making their own money.

Like I have said, be very cautious with women who are adamant about wanting security in life. They will eat everything they can to feather their nest, and Marriage, Inc. is the perfect institution for these women. These women are very cold and calculating and like a ruthless corporation view everything in terms of profit. In addition to "marriage CEO" another good name for these women is Calculatress because they're always calculating.

If you're not careful these women will bleed your ass dry, along with everything else that is within their web of influence. According to them everything must go into the marriage machine, which serves her own interests and that of her children, all courtesy of you, the workhorse (i.e. husband). This is natural selection at work, since the ancestral women who did this were best at ensuring the survival of future generations. However, given that we are supposed to live in a civil society now that doesn't cater to barbaric behaviour, there must be "strict moral sanctions" to curtail this tendency in women, because all natural instincts, in the absence of checks and balances, will ultimately be destructive. Modern society in a way has removed some of these natural checks and balances which were there when survival was more difficult.

I'm not saying women will necessarily go into a marriage thinking that they'll do all this (although some do I'm sure). But when marriage happens it's like a switch goes off in their heads and all of a sudden everything becomes crystal clear in terms of what they have to do to run the marriage like a business. They suddenly become the master CEO of Marriage, Inc., micro-managing everything they can. And with the laws surrounding marriage being what they are in favor of women, it is far too tempting for women not to indulge this nasty instinct they have. Only a truly strong and honest woman can overcome this and keep a sense of fair play.

Ultimately, Marriage, Inc. wouldn't be possible without the white knight instinct of men (also based on natural selection). A man who wishes to indulge his white knight instincts will pander to all the wishes of the marriage CEO because he wants to be a good husband (i.e. worker). That said, you will never know a man's true character until he gets the pussy, and then see how he behaves. Scoundrel men are the first to indulge their baser instincts (like greed, selfishness) which includes their white knight instinct where women are concerned.

Bottom line, resist your white knight instinct. Make a serious effort to view things as an outside observer would, keeping concepts of fairness in mind. You can have women in your life but my recommendation is don't marry. At most live together but be aware of what the laws say regarding common law living. Get legal advice if necessary. Don't get suckered.

Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Reader Submission: Privileged Toronto Women

Have you ever wondered how can a middle to upper class white woman in Toronto be placed in the same category as low-income First Nations people who live in poverty?

The “equity policies” in Toronto never cease to amaze me.

I was a Ryerson University student from 2012 to 2015, and I was amazed that while lectures about white heterosexual men were subjected to labeling them as “racists”, “misogynists” and other epithets which are constantly uttered by the academic professors, criticizing white women at Ryerson University is considered a cardinal sin worse than a slave owner shouting the n-word at an African lady during a KKK rally.

I do not understand why a white middle-upper class woman in Toronto is considered a protected class. As a person of non-white descent, I have endured way more “oppression” in Canada that these privileged white women feminists can ever be faced in their lifetime.

Do white feminists in Toronto ever consider that  immigrant people in general are automatically discriminated in the Canadian job market because they lack the “Canadian experience”? I'm very certain that if competition was allowed in Canada, these white feminists who sit comfortably in their ivory office towers will be out of a job.

What puzzled me was that in 2013, one of the Introductory Sociology professors, a white lady who was pregnant at the time, was always insisting that female professors at Ryerson University were paid less than a male professor due to sexism.

Judging by how she would come to lectures in those legging pants and with her cleavage showing, how can a person like myself take any Toronto woman seriously if she presents herself in her white collar job looking like a cheap hooker?

I recently saw a video from Ryerson University which stated that “consent is dynamic and can be revoked at anytime” so Good luck to anyone attending Ryerson University now.

Any woman who was born in Toronto and identifies herself as a feminist lives a way easier life than the top 10% of earners in the immigrant class.

A look at the salary scale of faculty at the three main universities in Toronto shows that a disproportionate amount of female professors earn over $100,000 Canadian dollars a year. Many immigrants to Canada who were doctors in their home countries end up working for $10/hr in Toronto. Which class of people are more discriminated? It doesn't look like the Toronto feminist class.

And don't get me started on how the media portrays women in Toronto as these victims of a constant “rape culture”. Just a few months ago, NDP politician Cheri DiNovo and her feminist allies Shauna Hunt and Cristine of CP24 News conspired to hound a French Guyanese guy for filming their anti-RooshV protest on a public park. Is Cheri Di Novo “offended” that she might be exposed as a liar for exaggerating that “1 in 2 Canadian women are victims of sexual assault in their lifetime”?

Shauna Hunt had previous experience of using her feminist privilege to confront a random man to have him sacked from his job at Hydro One. On the other hand, it has come to my knowledge that in Toronto, a police officer is not allowed to investigate incidents where female teachers strip naked in front of minor students. The reason why female teachers in Toronto would want to strip naked in front of 5-year-old kids is unknown because these same female teachers will tell the female students how their male classmates are potential rapists and oppressors of women in a “rape culture' society, so it's indeed bizarre for the motives of female TDSB teachers wanting to strip naked in front of kids and not wanting any criminal investigation involved.

Toronto sounds like a horrible feminist place where men are viewed as enemies while the Toronto women are viewed as the victims, even if they earn more money than the immigrant class, and even when the Toronto female teachers are immune from criminal investigations when they strip naked in front of minor students.

Let's hope that Toronto feminism does not infect the entire continent.

Wednesday, September 9, 2015

Reader Submission: Black Women In Toronto

Interesting note on Black Women in Toronto.

Out of all the unfortunate weirdness that occurs with Toronto's dating scene, this one has to be most common. Black women don't like dating black men but throw themselves at European looking men. I can go on a dating website and pick out the prettiest black women and expect positive responses. So for any man who isn't Black or Indian in this city, you can have many dates with pretty Black females. Now when I'm on these dating websites I try really hard to date within my race but I hardly get any success. So I get really desperate and send out some messages to the prettiest black females and within a couple of hours to a day we will be talking. I have a friend who has Eritrean looks. He isn't a bad looking guy for today's standards and is smart but a bit shy. Also he doesn't have that swag style. He tells me that he has problems looking for females of his own ethnicity here. So it seems that Black women don't like dating their own race in this city.

Now, all other decent looking females throw themselves at the best looking males who need to have mandatory blue eyes and almost blonde hair. This indicates that females in Toronto are extremely prejudiced and if you don't fit the model of perfect man you won't be given the time of day.

Reader Submission: Lessons From History

Hi guys,

Each time in history a consistent persecution was carried out against a certain social group, that was based on a story that this group was privileged and had a secret agenda that was harming society. Let's not give some trivial examples here, such as the Kulaks in Ukraine, among many other. Having grown up in a Communist country, I will give a couple of instances of how things used to work back then.

Every single propaganda machine, in my opinion, directed at achieving a certain thinly veiled political goal, works on roughly the same principles:

1. A mixture of half-truths, selective representation of facts, straight lies and wild exaggerations, designed to appeal emotionally to the population.

Example 1- the rotting capitalist world is full of poverty, inequality and there are people dying on the streets in Western Europe, while rich bankers eat lobsters in the restaurant a wall away. In our great Soviet Union we take care of everyody because it is a workers' paradise. But they hate us because they are jealous and want to take enslave us. Be afraid and get ready to defend yourself!

2. Simplification of the terms: you are either with us or against us, there is nothing in between. Try to question any of our views and you become an enemy.

Example 2- you are either a communist (the good guy) or a capitalist (the bad guy). There is nothing in between.

3. The third pillar of the propaganda machine is the repeating ad nauseam of the aforementioned half-truths, exaggerations and straight lies (which, strongly emotionally appealing, get gobbled up like hot cakes, too). At some point they sink so deep inside people's heads, especially if the people in question have grown up listening to them since day one (i.e. the glorious Y, or mine, generation, like OMG my iPhone battery just died), that even the mild suggestion of an alternative reality is immediately cast down as absurd, stupid, and its author- denounced as weird, such a favourite word of the modern woman. Dogmatism is established.

Example 3- every single day you are listening about the great achievements of the great Soviet Union, the great surpassing of the 5 year plan and how much better off you are than the rotting capitalism. Every single time you listen to the news. At least once every day, often a couple of times.

4. Fitting in- once a certain level of indoctrination in society has been achieved, perforce or voluntarily, you cannot afford to disagree anymore. For most people that comes naturally, especially for women, as many automatically accept what is required for fitting in to be good and don't really give it a second thought. I have seen this countless times.

Example 4- you work in a factory where pretty much everybody is a convinced communist. Try to criticize the invasion of Afghanistan, although in general you support the Soviet Union, and you will see how many enemies you will make. How your boss will treat you after that. And how you will fall into isolation. People will start spreading rumours about you. And in the end you will either leave or get your ass fired.

5. You always tend to see as just what benefits you. This refers to the seminal arguments "don't blame others for your own mistakes".

Example 5- I am a convinced communist and a Party member who has a special pass for better, and longer vacations in the summer, has access to better foods, better quality building materials for the renovation of my house through my better connections, etc. etc. I also work as a factory foreman. What do you think I am going to tell you if you start complaining about communism? Exaclty- see how well it worked out for me, if it didn't for you, you have only yourself to blame.

By now you are probably wondering why did I write all of this and what does it have to do with us. Well, take examples 1 to 5 and see their recreation in the propaganda machine we are exposed to today:

Example 1: Every 4th woman in Canada is reaped. Every second female university student is harrassed. They are among us!

Example 2- you are either a feminist or woman-hater, rape apologist, pig and a swine, privileged patriarchal oppressor!

Example 3: Try to express the opinion that most of the family violence in Canada is non-physical to you co-workers, and that it is committed by men and women alike.

Example 4: Every single day, at least 1 of the 6-7 headlines on CP24 is about sexual assault. The story about Jian Ghomeshi fit into the spectrum very, very well. Open the weekly Toronto Star and there will be AT LEAST one article about how difficult it is to be a woman, gay, transgender or how a 8 year old boy has decided to be a girl.

Example 5- I am a convinced feminist who is 5'9", never exercise, eat anything I will, weigh 190lb because I'm all about that bass and every week I go out with at least 2 different, stylish, tall (under 6', I just can't do, you see, I have a thing for tall men, it's just me) and often athletic men, who drive me around with their BMW's and want to hook up with me. You are complaining that with your 5'10" you can never get a date? It's clearly your fault, just stop being so passive and be a man for once, like men these days are such pansies!

So, what can we do? Stay here and hope to find a woman who has spent virtually all her life in perfect isolation (which is the only way to escape being affected by feminism)?

I am getting out of here, I don't know about you. 10 years in Toronto, trying to prove to myself that it's all in my head were enough.

Sincerely yours,
Pop Gruyo Banski

Reader Submission From Germany Part 4

I actually received this submission about a year ago so I'm a little late in posting this :)


Hello! The german here.

I wrote some stuff on this blog two years ago. Since then, a long time has passed and i now want to share my experience regarding detachment from women.

Before i start describing i should explain what value detachment from women holds for me, because the process of detachment is influenced by my views and is generally happening in my head. Detachment from women means freedom to me. E.g.:

- not having to pretend to like the conversation hoping for intimacy
- not having the need to associate with women, because i want to fuck
- ...

I've become an incredible lazy person regarding courtship. My last date was roughly one year ago and i do not even care. I do not miss anything. I do not miss talking with girls, I do not miss them teasing me and so on.

I only engage in flirting, when the girl is really nice, attractive and clearly interested AND when i am in a social mood.

I visited a very annoying seminar last semester. Just when i was about to rush out of the room at the end of the last session a nice and attractive girl, who liked me from the beginning, started flirting with me. She was touching my arm in an unusual way, holding intense eye contact, saying "goodbye, take care..."(in german, you normally do not say "take care" as part of the leave taking). I just wanted to get out, because the seminar was so very annoying at the end. So i said, "yeah you too" and was out.

A classical chance missed. I felt slight remorse for a short time and moved on. My own indifference surprised me.

The jealousy i felt sometimes, when i saw a good looking girl with another guy is gone. Very rarely, when i am in a very bad mood, it returns as a very weak emotion, which disappears in seconds.

Sex for me happens rarely. Basically only when my russian girl comes to Germany. The last time she visited was the summer last year. She does not take up much time in my life, but for the occasional email. I do really like her though, she has a nice character and i enjoy the very rare sexual encounters, but i am not dependent on them. I can take good care of my sexual urges myself, which is very important.

All in all my happiness has increased significantly after i abandoned Pick-Up and detached from women. The hardest thing on the way was:

- Not having the validation of women/the lair anymore to boost the ego.

When i did Pick Up my performance was directly correlated to the response women/the lair gave me. And naturally i got used it. The positive responses were sunshine for my self worth. The negative responses of women were not that bad for my self worth, because my wingmen in the lair gave me props for approaching anyway.

When i stopped Pick Up it were the positive responses from the lair and the women, which i craved. I had mood swings going from content to miserable for apparently no reason. Not a nice thing to have. But over time i got used to it and cold approaching became alien to me. My mood stabilized and bad moods became a rare thing. Nowadays i mostly feel satisfied and happy with the occasionally bad day, which everyone has from time to time.

So i evolved into a mostly happy and content individual. My interest in dating or flirting with women gradually declined as i were not willing to put the effort into online dating and my social circle consisted (and still consists) mostly of males. I had a few dates with other girls, one i described on that blog, which led to nowhere. I was mostly interested in sex with those girls, since they were not very interesting personalities and could not make me laugh. This led to me not willing to play the entertainer for them the entire date, as this was too much work for sex. One date i fucked up though :D.

This is my experience so far, i hope you could take something useful out of it.